Uhp Graphite Electrode trade is among the most important commodities of global trading. Seair Exim Solutions has a database of Uhp Electrode shipments that are available in the United States. These data are based on actual shipping records and help companies identify profitable markets, suppliers, and buyers. The Uhp Graphite Electrode shipping data can be filtered by quality, unit of measure, country of export, and other factors to meet specific business requirements. To access this data, a paid subscription is required.
Graphite electrodes are used to manufacture steel and other nonferrous metals using the electric arc and laddle routes. The electrodes must be highly conductive to ensure the process is successful. In terms of the demand for both graphite and steel, the graphite electrodes market is closely tied to that industry. The price of electrodes are therefore closely tied to the production of iron and steel, as well as the wider economy.
In 2007, graphite electrodes enjoyed very favorable market conditions, with high prices and strong sales. The market's supply contracts, which cover 6-12-month periods, can cause a delay between the change in sales volume and its effect on prices.
The Uhp Graphite Electrode industry is concentrated and there are few large producers. These companies are mainly located in India or China. Hindustan Electro Graphite Limited (HEG Limited) is the sole company exporting graphite electrode systems that cooperated with this review. The cooperating manufacturer claimed that they used both duty-free imported regular coke, as well as needle coke, sourced from the Indian markets for their production of electrode systems for the export and domestic markets. The Department of Commerce did find that the information was not credible.
The Commission decided to start a review of five years (sunset period) of the order imposing antidumping duties on small diameter graphite electrodes imported from the People's Republic of China. No. 731-TA-1143). The full text of the initiation notice is published at 84 FR 18477 (May 1, 2019). The Department of Commerce is to determine if the revocation of an order would be likely to result in continued or repeated material injury over a reasonably foreseeable period. This action has been taken under section 777.i) of 1974 Trade Act.
English
Write a Message